Large language models (LLMs) exhibit in-context learning abilities which enable the same model to perform several tasks without any task-specific training. In contrast, traditional adaptation approaches, such as fine-tuning, modify the underlying models for each specific task. In-context learning, however, consistently underperforms task-specific tuning approaches even when presented with the same examples. While most existing approaches (e.g., prompt engineering) focus on the LLM's learned representations to patch this performance gap, our experiments actually reveal that LLM representations contain sufficient information to make good predictions. As such, we focus on the LLM's reasoning abilities and demonstrate that this performance gap exists due to their inability to perform simple probabilistic reasoning tasks.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit in-context learning abilities which enable the same model to perform several tasks without any task-specific training. In contrast, traditional adaptation approaches, such as fine-tuning, modify the underlying models for each specific task. In-context learning, however, consistently underperforms task-specific tuning approaches even when presented with the same examples. While most existing approaches (e.g., prompt engineering) focus on the LLM's learned representations to patch this performance gap, our experiments actually reveal that LLM representations contain sufficient information to make good predictions. As such, we focus on the LLM's reasoning abilities and demonstrate that this performance gap exists due to their inability to perform simple probabilistic reasoning tasks.

Parameter-efficient tuning (PET) methods such as LoRA, Adapter, and Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) have found success in enabling adaptation to new domains by tuning small modules within a transformer model. However, the number of domains encountered during test time can be very large, and the data is usually unlabeled. Thus, adaptation to new domains is challenging; it is also impractical to generate customized tuned modules for each such domain. Toward addressing these challenges, this work introduces PLUTO: a Plug-and-pLay modUlar Test-time domain adaptatiOn strategy. We pre-train a large set of modules, each specialized for different source domains, effectively creating a ``module store''. Given a target domain with few-shot unlabeled data, we introduce an unsupervised test-time adaptation (TTA) method to (1) select a sparse subset of relevant modules from this store and (2) create a weighted combination of selected modules without tuning their weights. This plug-and-play nature enables us to harness multiple most-relevant source domains in a single inference call. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that PLUTO uniformly outperforms alternative TTA methods and that selecting $\leq$5 modules suffice to extract most of the benefit. At a high level, our method equips pre-trained transformers with the capability to dynamically adapt to new domains, motivating a new paradigm for efficient and scalable domain adaptation.